The Development of the Art Market in England:
Money as Muse, 1730–1900

Thomas M. Bayer and John R. Page

Is the Art MarketLike the Stock Market?

John Page
A. B. Freeman School of Business

Thomas Bayer
Department of Art History

Tulane University

Plan of presentation

  • Descriptive tatistics and characteristics of the art market
  • Development of an art market index
  • Hedonics: estimation of prices for artworks from their characteristics
  • Toward a model of the market, giving characteristics of market participants
  • Future steps in this research

Primary source:

Graves, Algernon. Art sales from early in the eighteenth century to early in the twentieth century. London, 1918-21; rpt. New York: B. Franklin, 1970. 3 vols.

Graves Data for Each Transaction

  • Artist name, with dates of birth and death
  • Picture title
  • Picture medium, date, height, and width
  • Auction house, with its lot number
  • Buyer name
  • Seller name
  • Price in pounds, shillings, and pence

Art Market Transactions, 1740-1909

DescriptionNumber
Total number of transactions39,568
Number with artist identified39,457
Number with picture title given39,552
Number with buyer name30,147
Number with seller name34,008
Number with auction house39,567

Counts of the Art Market Transactions

DescriptionNumber
Number of artists1,837
Number of separate artworks33,266
Number of buyers3,551
Number of sellers3,890
Number of auction houses90
Number of picture mediums4

Overall Statistics for the Transactions

measurementNMeanMedianMinMaxSum
Price (£)34,7973271580.424,25011,380,004
Length (in.)17,05730251303
Width (in.)17,05829251374
Size (in.²)17,0551,115650154,540
Picture date5,4811841186214631907
Sale date39,124Mar1868May1881Mar1741Dec1909
Chart of Art Market Log of price per square inch
Bubble Chart of Artwork Sold at Auction, 1740–1909
Scatter graph of Artmarket log of price over time 1840–1910
Scatter graph of artmarket log of price per square inch over time 1840–1910

Coding added to Graves data

  • Art code for artists
    • Contemporary vs. Old Master
    • Continental vs. English
  • Buyer status
  • Seller status
  • Artist, buyer, and seller sex
  • Subject of artwork

Statistics for Art Code

Art CodeNNₚMedian price (£)NₛMedian sizeTotal value (£)
Contemporary Continental3,3403,2812102,2173911,216,538
Contemporary English15,22714,5391797,3576004,866,248
Old Master Continental11,7038,8981684,0356443,064,499
Old Master English9,1877,970743,3697502,210,008

Old Master Painters

Continental

  • Rubens — 536
  • Rembrandt — 392
  • David Teniers — 344
  • B.E. Murillo — 282
  • Jacob Ruysdael — 261
  • Albert Cuyp — 234
  • P. Wouvermans — 231
  • VanDyck — 220

English

  • Joshua Reynolds — 2,423
  • Gainsborough — 1,490
  • George Romney — 515
  • George Morland — 423
  • Thomas Lawrence — 294
  • John Constable — 273

Contemporary Painters

Continental

  • Birket Foster — 252
  • Peter De Wint — 183
  • Josef Israels — 152
  • Pierre Frere — 143
  • Rosa Bonheur — 135
  • Verboekhoven — 132
  • Camille Corot — 106
  • Fantin-Latour — 91

English

  • J.M.W. Turner — 1,413
  • David Cox — 657
  • Edwin Landseer — 648
  • Thomas Cooper — 552
  • John Linnell — 485
  • William Hunt — 388
  • Anthony Fielding — 339
  • William Muller — 309
Graph of Artmarket Smoothed average of log (price) 1740–1910

Statistics for Types of Buyers

BuyerNNₚMedian price (£)NₛMedian sizeTotal value (£)
Artist474710567599,701
Bought-in2,1822,1501492881,033602,980
Dealer16,72716,6862059,7665877,069,830
Institution85855252152088,296
Middle class19,73215,0391166,7756963,346,864
Upper class795790151199750262,334

Statistics for Types of Sellers

SellerNNₚMedian price (£)NₛMedian sizeTotal value (£)
Artist2,9032,11239637690245,546
Dealer1,4781,3111426111,008341,866
Institution176711472839914,132
Middle class29,06426,13316813,3516128,622,283
Upper class5,9475,1701682,4287362,156,177

Sex Effects

CategoryNNₚMedian price (£)NₛMedian sizeTotal value (£)
Artist, Female350301210178645147,980
Artist, Male39,21834,49615816,87765011,232,024
Buyer, Female5151100188319,803
Buyer, Male39,51734,74615817,03764811,370,200
Seller, Female1,7461,653137655612528,059
Seller, Male37,82233,14416116,40065510,851,945

Statistics for Art Subjects

SubjectNNₚMedian price (£)NₛMedian sizeTotal value (£)
Animal2,2902,1241581,023713635,131
Genre8,0657,2751793,6385462,395,497
History1,5471,3261525501,008414,657
Interior356311158157374102,611
Landscape12,51911,6141796,0154863,884,493
Marine1,2101,125194548570381,159
Mythology1,4701,0241424231,160339,545
Portrait7,4816,5331053,1007502,153,356
Religious4,0452,9421421,274832959,368
Still Life576523158327252114,188

Reactions to summary statistics

Characteristics of art works change

  • Old master English paintings have more portraits
  • Contemporary paintings have more landscapes; coincidentally(?), landscapes sell for the highest price per square inch
  • Contemporary English have more animal, history, and marine
  • Contemporary continental paintings are smaller

Are these changes the result of dealers?

Characteristics of the Art Market

“Bad”

  • Transactions occur at unevenly spaced dates
  • Transactions are usually not of the same item

“Good”

  • Have transactions over 170 years
  • Artists often resold, even if individual works are not
  • Frequently know both buyer and seller

Calculation of art market index

  • Cannot use mean or median prices because of potential changes in buying and selling patterns
    • Change in average quality or size
    • Buy-ins around real price decreases
    • Change in type of art purchased (taste)
  • We will use artwork actually sold more than once during the time period

Identifying resales of artworks

  • Begin with artist match and title match, but
    • Title given in many forms, different languages
    • Same title given to preliminary drawings, smaller copies, and similar paintings
    • Picture date often missing, size given inconsistently
  • Tried to match on picture date, picture medium, and size
  • Presumption was artworks sold less than 5 times were the same, more than 5 times were different
  • Sample size goes to 2,090

Adaptation of Housing Index Regression

Source: J.A.S.A., Bailey, Muth and Nourse

  • yᵢ = log₁₀(price of the iᵗʰ artwork at second sale)
    • log₁₀(price on its first sale date)
  • Independent variables consist only of dummy variables, one for each time period in the sample except for the first.
  • For each artwork, the dummy variables are zero except for the dummy corresponding to the second sale, where it is +1, and for the dummy corresponding to the first sale, where it is -1.
  • The estimated coefficients are then taken as the log price index.
Art Market Index Chart 1840–1910

Estimation of price: hedonics

  • Begin with estimate of an individual artist
  • Estimate price per square inch
  • Characteristics include
    • Artist living or dead
    • Picture medium
    • Subject of painting
  • For regression of all artists distinguish
    • Contemporary vs. Old Master
    • Continental vs. English
Graph Log of prices per square inch over time

Analysis of Variance of COX

SourceDFSum of SquaresMean SquareF ValueProb > F
Model9101.6014511.2890516.9000.0001
Error365243.815410.66799
C Total374345.41686
StatisticValueStatisticValue
Root MSE0.81730R-square0.2941
Dep Mean-0.22285Adj R-sq0.2767
C.V.-366.74668

Parameter Estimates

VariableDFParameter EstimateStandard ErrorT for H0: Parameter=0Prob > |T|
INTERCEP1-13.3328476.64107410-2.0080.0454
LIVING1-2.2710320.26880794-8.4490.0001
MEDIUM1-0.2037960.09077196-2.2450.0254
Y10.0070820.003506302.0200.0441
ANIMAL1-0.2664310.21808228-1.220.2226
RELIGION10.3198060.394223450.8110.4178
MARINE10.0077020.34275970.0220.9821
PORTRAIT1-1.0427110.43811836-2.3800.0178
LANDSCAPE1-0.1147810.15540833-0.7390.4606
STILLIFE1-0.0549190.83107343-0.0660.9473

GARCH Estimates for COX

StatisticValueStatisticValue
SSE218.226OBS370
MSE0.5898UVAR0.590282
Log L-426.952Total Rsq0.3682
SBC948.5204AIC885.9043
Normality Test8.5978Prob > Chi-Sq0.0136
VariableDFB ValueStd Errort RatioApprox Prob
Intercept10.0638380.16780.3800.7036
LIVING1-2.4752270.3880-6.3790.0001
MEDIUM1-0.1975080.1023-1.9300.0536
PORTRAIT1-0.5832980.3867-1.5080.1315
A(1)1-0.2517410.0557-4.5220.0001
A(2)1-0.0936730.0581-1.6110.1071
ARCH010.5595110.055810.0290.0001
ARCH110.0521290.06990.7460.4558
GARCH116.059098E-233.29E-150.0001.0000

Ordinary Least Squares Estimates for All Artists

StatisticValueStatisticValue
SSE28670.62DFE16402
MSE1.747996Root MSE1.322118
SBC55888.41AIC55772.82
Reg Rsq0.1463Total Rsq0.1463
Durbin-Watson1.2906
VariableDFB ValueStd Errort RatioApprox Prob
Intercept1-26.5430540.9189-28.8860.0001
LIVING1-0.0740380.0309-2.3970.0166
MEDIUM10.8167030.034723.5070.0001
Y10.0136600.00048828.0000.0001
ANIMAL1-0.2718420.0475-5.7280.0001
RELIGION1-0.4786790.0470-10.1940.0001
MYTH1-0.5375830.0711-7.5660.0001
MARINE1-0.1810790.0611-2.9610.0031
INTERIOR10.0527700.10980.4800.6309
PORTRAIT1-0.3010740.0379-7.9480.0001
LANDSCAPE10.0085590.02900.2950.7680
STILLIFE10.1508210.07781.9390.0525
HISTORY1-0.5763090.0623-9.2550.0001
CONTEMP10.2321290.02927.9570.0001
ENGLISH1-0.5535300.0234-23.6280.0001

GARCH Estimates for All Artists

StatisticValueStatisticValue
SSE18983.72OBS12955
MSE1.465359UVAR1.476947
Log L-20716Total Rsq0.4347
SBC41782.39AIC41506.03
Normality Test152.6979Prob > Chi-Sq0.0001
VariableDFB ValueStd Errort RatioApprox Prob
Intercept1-0.5831270.0425-13.7240.0001
LIVING1-0.0638570.0388-1.6460.0997
MEDIUM10.6420790.046313.8590.0001
ANIMAL1-0.2075240.0505-4.1130.0001
RELIGION1-0.4089710.0449-9.1190.0001
MYTH1-0.3537670.0672-5.2680.0001
MARINE1-0.1266790.0641-1.9760.0481
INTERIOR1-0.0081820.1059-0.0770.9384
PORTRAIT1-0.2047540.0353-5.7940.0001
LANDSCAPE1-0.0204220.0302-0.6760.4990
STILLIFE10.0336850.09140.3690.7123
HISTORY1-0.4225190.0553-7.6370.0001
CONTEMP10.0489160.03341.4630.1434
ENGLISH1-0.4729770.0285-16.6150.0001
A(1)1-0.2904870.00947-30.6870.0001
A(2)1-0.0957210.00998-9.5950.0001
A(20)1-0.0188710.00864-2.1850.0289
ARCH010.3093260.03478.9230.0001
ARCH110.1023530.0091611.1760.0001
GARCH110.6882110.028524.1720.0001

Results of hedonic regressions

  • Different artists have statistically different prices
  • “Death is good.”
  • Landscape, still life, and interior paintings have highest price per square inch (measure of effort?)
  • Religious, mythological, and history paintings sell for less
  • English artists sell for less
  • Strong autocorrelation of prices

Market participants

  • Buyers. Early, dealers are not buyers, but by 1870 buyers are primarily dealers.
  • Sellers. These are primarily infrequent sellers, usually middle class or upper class, often at death. Dealers rarely sell.
  • Auction houses. Christie’s does not start until 1770, but quickly becomes dominant.

TABLE OF LARGEST BUYERS BY ARTCODE

Frequency / Row Pct

BuyerCCCEOMCOMETotal
Agnew415
8.28
3,323
66.29
456
9.10
819
16.34
5,013
Colnaghi34
3.18
144
13.46
564
52.71
328
30.65
1,070
McLean114
15.30
481
64.56
25
3.36
125
16.78
745
Tooth240
29.27
471
57.44
27
3.29
82
10.00
820
Vokins130
13.21
705
71.65
39
3.96
110
11.18
984
Wallis250
35.92
289
41.52
44
6.32
113
16.24
696
Total1,1835,4131,1551,5779,328

Support of artists by dealers

Most

  • Maris — 84%
  • Frere — 80%
  • Graham — 76%
  • Guardi — 76%
  • Alma-Tadema — 73%
  • Davis — 71%
  • Collins — 70%
  • Josef Israels — 70%

Least

  • Carracci — 29%
  • Raphael — 26%
  • Rossetti — 26%
  • Guido Reni — 25%
  • Velasquez — 24%
  • Titian — 19%
  • Poussin — 15%
  • Guercino — 3%
Sales Chart between dealers, middle class, and upper class — 1740–1910

TABLE OF LARGE SELLERS BY ARTCODE

Frequency / Row Pct

SellerCCCEOMCOMETotal
Mr. Bryan0
0.00
0
0.00
203
98.54
3
1.46
206
A.C. Calonne0
0.00
0
0.00
217
95.59
10
4.41
227
Hamilton Palace0
0.00
2
0.98
187
91.22
16
7.80
205
H.J.A. Monro0
0.00
125
54.35
74
32.17
31
13.48
230
Messrs. Murietta76
35.85
113
53.30
17
8.02
6
2.83
212
J.H.S. Pigott0
0.00
5
2.39
111
53.11
93
44.50
209
Sir J. Reynolds0
0.00
0
0.00
286
96.62
10
3.38
296
Benjamin West0
0.00
0
0.00
70
27.34
186
72.66
256
Total762451,1653551,841

Number of times at Auction

Buyers

  • Agnew — 748
  • Colnaghi — 404
  • Vokins — 369
  • Tooth — 364
  • McLean — 350
  • Wallis — 303
  • Permain — 203
  • Gooden — 195

Sellers

  • Henry Wallis — 25
  • Thomas McLean — 17
  • Woodburn — 12
  • Alton — 11
  • Mr. Bryan — 11
  • Colnaghi — 11
  • L.V. Flatou — 10
  • Hamilton Palace — 10
Chart of Auction Houses 1740–1910
Chart of Auction Houses in millions of pounds, 1740–1910

Dealer market characteristics

  • Dominate as buyers
  • Pay more on average
  • Infrequently use auctions to sell
  • Specialize by art code and artist (To avoid competition?)
  • Avoid
    • Lower-priced artwork
    • Larger paintings
    • Religious and mythological paintings

Characteristics of non-dealers

  • Sell very infrequently
  • Artists purchase in lower-price range
  • Highest buy-in rate is in lowest price range
  • Institutions concentrate on higher-priced paintings
  • Highest buy-in rate is in largest paintings

Economic model of art market

  • Dealer appears to function as market maker
  • Dealer can pay more because of his inventory
  • Sellers are liquidity traders
  • Evidence of efficiency
    • Cannot buy and sell profitably in the auction market
    • Artwork bought-in sells for less than the buy-in price
    • Highest buy-in rate is for dealers as sellers
    • Prices rise after death
  • Evidence of inefficiency: strong autocorrelation

What needs to be done

  • Reduction of dimensionality in hedonic regression by grouping statistically similar artists together
  • Interpret Arch/Garch results
  • Decide whether this database and concepts should be one paper or two
  • Develop economic model of dealers and this market

Possible future research questions

  • Would the use of hedonic regressions help produce a better art index?
  • How would these results change or remain consistent with current data?
  • What is the implicit bid/ask spread of the dealer? Is it currently decreasing?
  • Is the traditional art market now breaking down?
  • Were there (Are there) opportunities to buy profitably?
  • Does a change in styles help artist prices?